|
|
How Other Hand Drying Options Compare with the Jet Towel®
Compared to the Jet Towel®, other hand-drying methods in public facilities have distinct drawbacks.
The Disadvantages of conventional hand-drying methods
| Paper towels |
- Absorbs water
- Only 1 person
- Disposable
- Easy to install
|
- Wastes precious resources
- Messy
- Costly
- High maintenance
|
- Quick dry time
- Touchless
- Saves resources
- Clean
- Low cost
- Low maintenance
|
| Cloth towels |
- Immediate use
- As-is
- Easy to install
|
- Unsanitary
- Often used up
- Difficult to use
- Expensive
|
- Touchless
- Low maintenance
- Quick dry time
- Enhanced cleanliness
|
| Traditional Hand Dryer |
- No contact
- Low maintenance
- Cheaper than paper towels
|
- Water mess
- Long dry time
- Noisy
- Unsanitary air
- Often not used
|
- Quick dry time
- No water mess
- Quiet
- No air cross contamination
- Popular
|
| Other High Speed Hand Dryers |
- No contact
- Quick dry time
- Low maintenance
|
- Noisy
- Water mess
- Separate ADA height
- Water blowback
|
- Quiet
- No water mess
- Only one mounting height
- No water blowback
- More energy efficient
|
Following Mitsubishi's innovative idea, many other industrial hand dryers now offer a 10-seconds dry time. None, however, can match the Jet Towel® in the following areas:
| - Energy Efficiency |
- Quiet Operations |
| - Cleanliness |
- Motor Life |
| - ADA Compliance |
- Design |
|
Copyright 2010 PACARC, LLC